The Healthy Muse
The latest bipartisan House surprise billing proposal this week pits providers and insurers against one another with benchmarking vs. arbitration language.

Surprise Billing: Benchmarking vs. Arbitration

Providers Lose Out in Latest Bipartisan Surprise Billing Draft

What’s New: Bipartisan leaders in Congress in both the House and Senate drafted a bill to combat surprise billing.

Details of the Surprise Billing Bill: Benchmarking vs. Arbitration Differences

The new bill is an altered version of older proposals. For bills under $750, insurers would pay providers at least the median in-network rates for that region.

  • You might have seen reporters call this the “benchmark rate” method.

For bills over $750, insurers and providers will negotiate through a third party – called the “arbitration” method.

Who Wants What: Benchmarking vs. Arbitration

Providers oppose the benchmarking part of the deal. They think the bill will lower reimbursement by giving them less room for negotiation (it will).

Insurers oppose arbitration because their negotiating leverage for larger costs goes out of their hands. So, since nobody’s happy, the bill is probably closing in on the right solution.

  • You should know: New York tried 3rd party arbitration to combat surprise billing in 2015. The catch? The bill guided arbitrators to use use the 80th percentile of billed charges as the starting point.

Here’s the problem with that: charges are generally made up numbers and do not correlate to actual reimbursement. Providers charge a certain amount for healthcare services but receive lower reimbursement from insurance/patients. As a result, providers ended up receiving higher payments in New York.

  • If Congress pegs the arbitration to a high level of charges like New York did, insurers could lose out big time. But it’s important to note that the national bill is different because it includes benchmarked rates.

Conclusion.

  • Who loses: Providers
  • Who’s in the middle: Insurers
  • Who wins: Patients

Keep in mind that this bill, while bipartisan, still has a long way to go – especially since a House panel just introduced a rival proposal. But these same solutions have been floating around Congress for a while now.

more stuff

The mid-level takeover edition

This week in healthcare: UnitedHealthcare earnings, Carbon Connects with Froedert Health, NPs get full practice authority in New York, Bright Health is exiting 6 markets after a dismal 2021, public health emergency gets extended, and DaVita gets acquitted.

Why Inflation Destroys Provider Margins

If they aren’t already, providers are about to get killed by inflation. How do those dynamics affect healthcare provider organizations? How do healthcare services businesses stave off intense expense margin pressures while also increasing top-line revenue?

The Unstoppable Optum Edition

This week in healthcare: Breaking down the Intermountain merger with SCL Health, Optum continues its buying spree in purchasing Kelsey-Seybold, Hims & Hers partnership with Carbon Health, a 7 hospital health system merger in West Virginia, Aveanna’s bad Q4, CMS payment updates, Memorial Hermann’s urgent care JV with GoHealth, and lots of fundraising announcements.

Subscribe to take your healthcare knowledge to the next level.

Get breakdowns on the latest trends, and keep up with the healthcare stories that matter.